As this community is all about you, the members who participate in it, we are going to ask the question and put it up for discussion so that we can come up with a sensible solution that makes sense to most.

 

Scope of the site and the idea behind it:

SpandexGuys is a networking site for guys who have a fetish for tight bulges in synthetic material (spandex/lycra).  Each person is allowed one profile in which he can tell others about himself, his likes, dislikes, all within the scope of the fetish. Most members take the time and effort to take pictures and post them and that is what draws people to the community and gets discussion and interaction going.

 

No Pictures or Profile Info

There are people who have not posted pictures of them or put information in their profiles. We have accepted that for now because we really want to avoid that people post pictures from the internet that are not of them or write some garbage in their profile just to satisfy a requirement to have pictures or information.  (It still happens)

 

The Question:

So, how can we convince people to share pictures and to put information in their profiles? We could force people to upload a picture when they register but will it really be them?

 

Please share your thoughts on:

Procedures

Limitations for those with empty profiles or no pictures

Bonuses for those with pictures

Bonuses for those with verified profiles (verification happening soon)

 

This is quite a serious discussion so please offer some constructive ideas which we can hopefully adapt as part of the overall solution and make the site more in tune with what you want.

 

Thanks!

Comments


acook59

  • Posted 3 months ago
How about puttig pics and profile details is part of the registration process and you can only create a profile when all of these fields are filled in?

Bryan_Lyte2

  • Posted 4 months ago
I came to a sharp realization today when a member pointed out that they have filled out their profile, when asked if they would fill in the rest of it. I think either they aren't aware of all of the profile, or that the wording of the other too sections is a put off to fill them in as it seems as though giving up too personal of information.

fitch

  • Posted 4 months ago
I am still annoy about vistors to my profile who have no pictures and any info. Then there are those profiles who have less than 5 rubbish pictures of either their crotch or ass with no info. Makes me wonder who are they really? They could be anyone these days.

XGenUK

  • Posted 4 months ago
Til this is an access only by fee site the issue will not subside, even then there will be incomplete profiles.
Are the incomplete profiles causing a financial burden? If not, admins should ignore them, it'll cost more policing them. How many people actually look at the info? Personally, in a similar way ignoring junk email, if I see a profile that lacks interesting content I just never go back & it never bothers me again, good profiles, I bookmark.

n2npaguy

  • Posted 4 months ago
I agree with Bryan Lyte. Let the amount of content added control the amount of content accessed. And someone else on here said if there is no picture(s) within 7 days, it gets deleted. Whilst people may use fake pics, at least it should put most off.

Also, it might be worth having an automated account delete unless people choose to set a holiday period by somehow contacting you to ensure it doesn't delete if you choose not to be here for a while....

option_

  • Posted 5 months ago
as for limitations:
if they havnt completed a section of their profile, eg 'sexual & gear', then they cant see that section on anyone elses

that makes the limitation equal & balanced

bonuses:
if you just have bonuses for pictures, if its based on say number of pictures, wont people just upload loads of either rubbish pics, or stolen ones?

option_

  • Posted 5 months ago
whats more important, pics or profile info?

personally, i dont see the point in a profile with no info but loads of pics

therefore, some parts of the profile should be made compulsory, & completed within something like 7 days
the parts that should be compulsory should be those that are relatively easy to fill in, & are less likely to be lied about, & dont change eg date of birth, eye colour, ethnicity, height

Bryan_Lyte2

  • Posted 5 months ago
All I wonder is why with the old site guys would post info and have little back stories and personality in their profiles, but now it's just a picture mill, and some guys don't even post past one pic. If there were a way I'd suggest that access be based upon completion. The more a person fleshes out their profile the more access to others they receive. If they only fill out the first part of the profile, they should be restricted to profiles that only fill out the first part, etc.

fitch

  • Posted 5 months ago
@OS777 You are not an a-hole thanks for bring this issue up bc it's a good idea.

1guyn2gear

  • Posted 5 months ago
as for pics.... I think they should be required. as for fake pics easy way to tell... Have each party who claims the pic belongs to them take a Face pic. and submit it via email to an admin. and wear the gear that the so called imposter is using in their profile.... obviously two people cant take the exact same pic.
You have 500 characters left for this message.